yota691 Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 Official: delay in approving the budget in 2014 would cause an economic crisis has crippled the country April 20, 2014 11:08 Last Updated: April 20, 2014 11:08 Parliamentary Finance Committee warned of a crisis of cash in the country as a result of a failure to approve the budget. Said committee member Rep. Dler Abdelkader: "The delay in approving the budget for 2014 will affect the overall economic situation in the country, both in terms of higher inflation or increase the exchange rate of the dollar against the dinar or stop the wheel of development." According to the newspaper integrity and added: "The Ministry of Finance began to lend the government money to walk matters of state until the adoption of the budget, and that means that the government will focus on paydays institutions and government departments will mean investment projects and development, and this will affect the wheel of development in the country " on the other hand Prime advisers in the Council of Ministers Thamer Anger that the country in front of a problem due to lack of approval of the House of Representatives of the general budget, "adding that" the proper procedure and the right to approve the budget earlier this year. " said Anger that failure to approve the budget will affect the growth of the Iraqi economy and the growth of the projects, noting that "the real problem lies in the new investment projects. "adding that" there is no fear on the operating budget or a contraction in the market due to the delay in the general budget, "pointing out that" the ongoing projects of the past years and will continue to be the operational budget and the exchange rate of 1/12 of 2013 " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10 YEARS LATER Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 Would and Has in the same sentence - which is it ? Would cause or Has caused . . . I would Fart or I have Farted . . . Big difference - just saying Howdy Yota Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontlop Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 (edited) They should of passed it with out the Kurds months ago The Kurds said ok ok We want to talk after they boycotted they vote And they just delayed and delayed They accplished nothing They remind me of the Iranians and their talks on enriching uranium They stall and stall and in the end they still did not negotiate anything I say vote the budget in and give the Kurds what they get and if they don't like it to bad What is it 18 out of 19 provinces will vote and the turds sit out Who cares don't let them bog down the entire country Maybe next year the Kurds will learn how to get by on what they get and expand their private sector so they can get more money if that's what they want Edited April 20, 2014 by dontlop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jobug38 Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 The Kurds are making deals all over. Maybe the US wanted them to stall? Who k.owe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francie26 Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 The Kurds have long wanted to go their own way, to keep and sell their own oil, and to have a lot more control than they do. I can understand that, since they felt they had to guard their oil for their own people after Saddam abused them so horribly. For a very long time, they simply didn't want to ever be any part of Iraq ever again. And they may still think that now. But they need to catch up -- they live in a different world now. And if they get involved in the greater Iraqi government, they will soon be a very rich country . . . err . . . part of Iraq. As to Maliki, he knows it is against their constitution for him to run for office again. And if he does it anyway, he is taking a pretty big chunk out of the ongoing validity of their constitution. They are still a very new democracy, still working the chinks out of it, and any large change in their constitution upon demand from Maliki could destroy the entire thing. That would effectively end the only truly democratic country in the middle-east. Obama wouldn't care. He likes the people who are against our country and our democracy. At least it seems like it because he sends anti-American governments in the region our hard-earned money often enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts