Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Central Bank: report of the international monetary support of our foreign exchange market liberalization


Recommended Posts

2013/30/07
 
Central Bank: report of the international monetary support of our foreign exchange market liberalization


 

Baghdad/Obelisk: banking sources said that the report on the work of the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund last month endorsed to the Iraqi Central Bank to release foreign currency market.

 

The sources said in a statement to "the Obelisk", "recently taken steps to streamline the organizational rules of the market born satisfaction of the Executive Board of progress made recently in the context of Central Bank strengthen bank supervision and its efforts in restructuring the Bank and Mesopotamia.

 

The report was issued by the International Monetary Fund, Iraq has recommended that the pace of structural reform to boost growth and job creation in the private sector, and the need to continue the rational management of the foreign reserves of the Central Bank of Iraq and the Development Fund for Iraq.
 

 

 

  • Upvote 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am very surprised I am the first poster on this article.

 

Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund last month endorsed to the Iraqi Central Bank to release foreign currency market.

 

Good news for Iraq and the closer we are getting to seeing a positive change in the IQD. :bravo:

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am very surprised I am the first poster on this article.

 

Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund last month endorsed to the Iraqi Central Bank to release foreign currency market.

 

Good news for Iraq and the closer we are getting to seeing a positive change in the IQD. :bravo:

Yes, nice. Wait and see. Thank you. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went to the IMF site and copy and pasted this, its pretty jumbled so best to go to the link. 

 

http://www.imf.org 

International Monetary Fund 
Washington, D.C. 
July 2013 IRAQ 
STAFF REPORT FOR THE 2013 ARTICLE IV CONSULTATION 
KEY ISSUES 
Context: Since 2003, close engagement with the Fund has helped Iraq maintain 
macroeconomic stability, despite a difficult political and security environment, external 
economic shocks, and a weak economic structure. In this context, the 2013 Article IV 
discussions focused on strengthening policies to realize Iraq’s economic potential and 
make growth more inclusive. 
Outlook: The positive trend in oil production and exports contrasts with the weakening 
economic governance deriving from an increasingly difficult political process and 
worsening security. The authorities will be able to fend off the danger of the natural 
resource curse if they can improve political and security conditions, strengthen economic 
institutions, and implement sound policies. Fiscal policies should aim at financing the 
needed social and investment spending while building up adequate fiscal buffers to 
insulate the economy from oil market shocks. On the back of large oil exports, strong 
current account performance is expected to result in the accumulation of international 
reserves. 
Main policy recommendations: The authorities need to be proactive in addressing 
medium-term challenges and risks by: (a) ensuring fiscal sustainability and building fiscal 
buffers to address volatility in oil revenues; (B) stepping up the liberalization of the 
foreign exchange market; © continuing the prudent management of reserves held by 
the Central Bank of Iraq and the Development Fund for Iraq; (d) deepening the reform of 
the financial sector, including the creation of a level playing-field for private banks; and 
(e) accelerating structural reform to promote private sector growth and employment 
creation. 
April 30, 2013 IRAQ
2 INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND
Approved By 
Alfred Kammer and 
Taline Koranchelian 
Discussions were held in Amman, Jordan during March 2–12, 2013. 
The staff team comprised Messrs. Sdralevich (head), Parodi, 
Alkhunaizi, Shbaikat, and Said (all MCD), Ms. Kirabaeva (MCM), and 
Mr. Nielsen (SPR). The team met with Acting Finance Minister 
Al-Shukri, Deputy Finance Minister Othman, Board of Supreme Audit 
Head and Acting Governor of the Central Bank of Iraq Al-Turki Said, 
other senior government officials, and representatives of the Iraqi 
private sector. Ms. Choueiri (OED) participated in the policy meetings

 

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2013/cr13217.pdf

 

 

 

REVIEW OF THE FUND’S INCOME POSITION FOR FY 2013 
AND FY 2014 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
FY 2013 net income is now projected at SDR 2.0 billion, including surcharges, broadly in 
line with the midyear estimate of SDR 2.1 billion. The income will help build the Fund’s 
precautionary balances, which are expected to reach SDR 11.5 billion at the end of 
FY 2013, consistent with the earlier estimates.
The paper includes decisions relating to the disposition of FY 2013 income, which are in 
line with the practice in recent years. A decision is proposed to resume the 
reimbursement of the General Resources Account for the expenses of conducting the 
business of the PRG Trust in line with the Executive Board’s approval of a long-term 
financing strategy for the PRGT in September 2012.
In April 2012, the Executive Board applied for the first time the new rule for setting the 
margin for the basic rate of charge and established a margin of 100 basis points for the 
two financial years FY 2013–14. As required under this new rule, staff has completed a 
full analysis of the underlying factors relevant for setting the margin and has 
determined that there have not been fundamental changes that would warrant a 
change in the margin for FY 2014.
The updated projections for FY 2014 point to a net income position of 
SDR 1.6-1.8 billion, compared with the April 2012 estimate of SDR 2.1 billion. The 
updated projections reflect lower lending income, primarily due to the expiration of 
arrangements with undrawn balances and lower non-lending income as a result of the 
low global interest rates and the agreement to phase in investments under the new 
gold-sales funded endowment. The projections are subject to considerable uncertainty 
and are sensitive to a number of assumptions. 
April 30, 2013 REVIEW OF THE FUND’S INCOME POSITION FOR FY 2013 AND FY 2014 
2 INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND
Approved By 
Andrew Tweedie 
Prepared by the Finance Department in consultation with the Legal 
Department and the Office of Budget and Planning 
CONTENTS 
INTRODUCTION __________________________________________________________________________________ 3
REVIEW OF THE FY 2013 INCOME POSITION ___________________________________________________ 3
DISPOSITION DECISIONS ________________________________________________________________________ 7
FY 2014 INCOME OUTLOOK _____________________________________________________________________ 9
REVIEW OF SPECIAL CHARGES _________________________________________________________________ 15
BOXES 
1. The Rule for Setting the Margin for the Basic Rate of Charge ___________________________________ 4
2. Reimbursement to the GRA from the PRG Trust _________________________________________________ 5
FIGURES 
1. Summary of Disposition Decisions ______________________________________________________________ 9
2. Projected Reserve Accumulation ______________________________________________________________ 11
3. EMBIG Spreads: Total Composite and Bottom Quartile _______________________________________ 12
4. Current Levels of SDR-Weighted Yields and Market-Implied Forward Rates __________________ 25
TABLES 
1. Projected Income and Expenditures—FY 2013 __________________________________________________ 6
2. Projected Income Sources and Uses—FY 2014 ________________________________________________ 13
3. Sensitivity Analysis-Effect of Changes in Selected Assumptions in FY 2014 ___________________ 14
4. Recent Burden Sharing Adjustment Rates and FY 2014 Quarterly Rates ______________________ 15
5. Income from the Margin and Reserve Accumulation __________________________________________ 22
6. Long-term Credit Market and Comparator Spreads ___________________________________________ 24
7. Investment Account Performance Scenarios __________________________________________________ 27
ANNEXES 
I. Decisions in Effect Related to the FY 2013 Income Position ____________________________________ 20
II. Framework on the Margin for the Rate of Charge _____________________________________________ 21
III. Investment Account (IA) Performance Scenarios ______________________________________________ 25
IV. Assumptions Underlying the Income Projections _____________________________________________ 28
V. Projected Income and Expenses—FY 2013–14 ________________________________________________ 29
VI. Cumulative Burden Sharing Adjustments at end–January 2013 ______________________________ 30REVIEW OF THE FUND’S INCOME POSITION FOR FY 2013 AND FY 2014 
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 3
INTRODUCTION 
1. This paper reviews the Fund’s income position for FY 2013 and FY 2014.
1
 The paper 
updates projections provided at the FY 2013 midyear review and proposes decisions for the current 
and next financial year. The paper includes a comprehensive review of the Fund’s income position as 
required under the new Rule I-6(4) adopted in December 2011 (see Box 1). Based on this review, no 
change in the margin for the rate of charge is proposed. 
2. The paper is structured as follows: The first section reviews the FY 2013 income position 
and the main changes from the midyear projections; the second section makes proposals on the 
disposition of FY 2013 net income, and placement to reserves; the third section discusses the margin 
on the rate of charge for FY 2014, updates the income projections, and reviews the projected 
burden sharing adjustments; and the last section reviews special charges.
REVIEW OF THE FY 2013 INCOME POSITION 
3. FY 2013 net income is now projected at SDR 2.0 billion, compared with SDR 2.1 billion at 
the midyear update (see Table 1).2
 Key factors affecting the latest projections are as follows:
 Lending income: Operational lending income (margin, service charges, and commitment fees) 
is estimated at about SDR 1.5 billion, consistent with the earlier estimate. The slightly higher 
income of SDR 5 million reflects higher commitment fees earned on the cancellation of some 
arrangements, partially offset by reduced margin income and service charges following the 
rephasing of scheduled disbursements under existing arrangements. Surcharge income is 
estimated at SDR 1.2 billion, in line with earlier estimates. 
 Investment income: Investment income for FY 2013 is estimated at SDR 58 million for the 
fixed-income subaccount (reserves portfolio), SDR 6 million for the endowment subaccount 
(gold profits portfolio) and SDR 0.036 million for the temporary windfall profits subaccount. 
Total IA income of SDR 64 million is expected to be about SDR 9 million lower than the midyear 
estimate due to lower-than-projected returns on government bonds. 
 Reimbursements to the General Resources Account (GRA): The GRA is reimbursed annually 
for the expenses of conducting the business of the SDR Department, of administering the PRGT 
Trust, and of administering SDA resources in the MDRI-I and the PCDR Trusts.3
 The GRA will be 
reimbursed for the expenses of conducting the business of the SDR Department in FY 2013 
1
 A companion paper provides an update on The Consolidated Medium-Term Income and Expenditure Framework 
(04/30/13). 
2
 The Fund’s Income Position for FY 2013—Midyear Update (12/21/12). 
3
 Reimbursement to the GRA from the MDRI-I and the PCDR Trusts is for expenses not already attributable to other 
accounts or trusts administered by the Fund, or to the GRA. REVIEW OF THE FUND’S INCOME POSITION FOR FY 2013 AND FY 2014 
4 INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND
 Box 1. The Rule for Setting the Margin for the Basic Rate of Charge 
Effective May 1, 2012, Rule I-6(4) reads as follows: 
"(4) The rate of charge on holdings (i) acquired as a result of a purchase under a policy that has been the 
subject of an exclusion under Article XXX©, or (ii) that exceed the amount of the member's quota after 
excluding any balances referred to in (i), shall be determined in accordance with (a) and (B) below. 
(a) The rate of charge shall be determined as the SDR interest rate under Rule T-1 plus a margin 
expressed in basis points. The margin shall be set at a level that is adequate (i) to cover the estimated 
intermediation expense of the Fund for the period under (B) below, taking into account income from 
service charges, and (ii) to generate an amount of net income for placement to reserves. The appropriate 
amount for reserve contribution shall be assessed taking into account, in particular, the current level of 
precautionary balances, any floor or target for precautionary balances, and the expected contribution 
from surcharges and commitment fees to precautionary balances; provided, however, that the margin 
shall not be set at a level at which the basic rate of charge would result in the cost of Fund credit 
becoming too high or too low in relation to long-term credit market conditions as measured by 
appropriate benchmarks. Notwithstanding the above, in exceptional circumstances, the margin may be 
set at a level other than that which is adequate to cover estimated intermediation expenses of the Fund 
and to generate an amount of net income for placement to reserves. 
(B) The margin shall be set for a period of two financial years. A comprehensive review of the Fund's 
income position shall be held before the end of the first year of each such two-year period and the 
margin may be adjusted in the context of such a review, but only if this is warranted in view of 
fundamental changes in the underlying factors relevant for the establishment of the margin at the start of 
the two-year period." 
through an assessment on participants in the SDR Department (proposed Decision 1).4
 These 
expenses are estimated at SDR 1.149 million. Expenses of conducting the business of the MDRI-I 
and PCDR Trusts are estimated at SDR 0.019 million and SDR 0.039 million, respectively 
(proposed Decisions 2 and 3). Starting in FY 2013, the practice of reimbursing the GRA for the 
expenses of conducting the business of the PRG Trust will be resumed (see Box 2). The 
reimbursement is an important element of the Fund’s income model endorsed in 2008 and the 
resumption of the reimbursement was part of the financing strategy approved in September 
2012 for the PRGT aimed at placing concessional lending on a self-sustaining basis over the 
longer term. Reimbursement had been included in the earlier projections. The estimated PRGT 
expenses for FY 2013 to be reimbursed to the GRA are SDR 52.21 million (proposed Decision 4). 
 Expenses: Net expenses are expected to be lower than projected by about SDR 22 million. The 
decrease reflects lower-than-projected expenses on capital projects (IT and facilities) of about 
SDR 4 million. The FY 2013 net administrative expenditures are also projected to be about 
4
 Consistent with paragraph 5(B) of Schedule M, the SDRs taken into account for purposes of calculating the 
assessment do not include SDR 87 million that, due to the overdue financial obligations of certain members, are 
being held in an escrow account pursuant to paragraph 5(a) of Schedule M. REVIEW OF THE FUND’S INCOME POSITION FOR FY 2013 AND FY 2014 
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 5
SDR 31 million lower than budgeted. The lower expenses are partially offset by movements in 
the U.S. dollar/SDR exchange rate of about SDR 13 million.5
 IAS 19 timing difference: The Fund’s pension and employee benefit expense is determined by 
the provisions of IAS 19, under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). A timing 
difference results between the actuarially determined IAS 19 expense related to benefits earned by 
employees during the financial year and the amount actually funded from the budget. The IAS 19 
expense for FY 2013 of SDR 249 million is higher than funding projected at SDR 102 million, which 
gives rise to a timing difference of SDR 147 million that decreases net income. 
Box 2. Reimbursement to the GRA from the PRG Trust 
In 1987, the Executive Board adopted a decision providing for the annual reimbursement of the GRA for the 
expenses of conducting the business of the then-ESAF Trust (now PRGT). While this reimbursement was 
frequently suspended by the Executive Board (see paragraph 2 below), a key element of the new income 
model endorsed by the Fund in 2008 was the resumption of the reimbursement of the GRA for PRGT 
administrative expenses. However, an exception was provided pursuant to which the Fund should 
temporarily suspend annual reimbursements of the GRA in respect of the expenses of conducting the 
business of the PRGT if a determination is made that the resources of the Trust are likely to be insufficient to 
support anticipated demand for PRGT assistance and the Fund has been unable to obtain additional subsidy 
resources. 
Since the inception of the Trust Fund in 1976, all administrative expenses associated with the cost of 
administering the Fund’s concessional lending have been accounted for, and normally the costs have been 
reimbursed to the GRA. Exceptions to the general rule have been agreed by the Executive Board in the 
context of funding initiatives since 1998 to increase concessional lending capacity or provide debt relief. 
During fiscal years 1998-2004, the Board agreed to suspend reimbursement and redirect SDR 366.2 million 
of such payments from the GRA to the PRGF-HIPC Trust, to help finance both subsidy needs and debt relief. 
Similarly, during fiscal years 2005-2009 SDR 237.3 million was redirected to benefit the PRGF-ESF Trust. 
As part of the 2009 LIC financing package, the Executive Board decided that for a period of three years 
(FY 2010–12), an amount equivalent to the expenses of operating the PRGT would be transferred from the 
PRGT Reserve Account to the General Subsidy Account of the PRGT instead of to the GRA. Suspending PRGT 
reimbursement to the GRA during these three years generated additional PRGT subsidy resources of 
SDR 147.9 million. 
In September 2012, the Executive Board approved a financing strategy for the PRGT aimed at 
placing concessional lending on a self-sustaining basis over the longer term. This strategy involves 
establishing a base lending envelope of SDR 1¼ billion annually by using already available 
resources and contributions from members linked to the remaining windfall profits from recent 
gold sales and also assumes the reimbursement of the GRA for PRGT administrative expenses to 
resume in FY 2013. If, however, demand for PRGT borrowing exceeds the base envelope by a 
substantial margin for an extended period, the strategy for the self sustained PRGT allows for the 
possibility that a further temporary suspension of reimbursement could be considered by the 
Executive Board (see Proposal to Distribute Remaining Windfall Gold Sales Profits and
Strategy to Make the Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust Sustainable, 9/17/2012). 
5
 The projected outturn is approximately US$47 million lower than budgeted (FY2014-FY2016 Medium Term Budget, 
3/29/13) and the updated US$/SDR exchange rate is about 1.52 compared with the earlier projection of 1.55. REVIEW OF THE FUND’S INCOME POSITION FOR FY 2013 AND FY 2014 
6 INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND
Table 1. Projected Income and Expenditures—FY 2013 
(in millions of SDRs) 
Source: Finance Department and Office of Budget and Planning 
1/ Review of the Fund’s Income Position for FY 2012 and FY 2013-14 (4/12/12). 
2/ The Fund’s Income Position for FY 2013—Midyear Update (12/21/12). 
3/ Consistent with the recently endorsed rules and regulations for the IA, the earnings from the endowment subaccount will be 
retained in the IA and therefore they are excluded from operational income. 
4/ Interest free resources reduce the Fund’s costs and therefore provide implicit returns. Since the Fund invests its reserves in the IA 
to earn a higher return, the interest free resources retained in the GRA are mainly attributable to the SCA-1, unremunerated reserve 
tranche positions not represented by gold holdings, and GRA income for the year not transferred to the IA. These resources 
reduce members’ reserve tranche positions and the Fund’s remuneration expense resulting in implicit income for the Fund. 
5/ IAS 19 is the accounting standard that prescribes the accounting treatment of pensions and employee benefit expenses, and 
involves actuarial valuations. The IAS 19 expense was determined in the actuarial valuation completed in June 2012. 
6/ Net income on the basis presented in the Fund’s IFRS annual financial statements. 
Initial 
Projections 1/
Midyear 
Projections 2/
Current 
Projections
A. Operational income 1,789 1,597 1,573
Lending income 1,577 1,452 1,457
 Margin for the rate of charge 1,006 933 919
 Service charges 106 71 57
 Commitment fees 465 448 481
Investment income 130 73 58
 Reserves 65 67 58
 Gold profits portfolio 65 6 - 3/
Interest free resources 4/ 15 5 5
Reimbursements 67 67 53
 MDRI-I, PCDR Trusts, and SDR Department 3 3 1
 PRG Trust 64 64 52
B. Expenses 683 683 661
Net administrative expenditures 643 643 625
Capital budget items expensed 7 7 6
Depreciation 33 33 30
C. Net operational income position (A-B) 1,106 914 912
Surcharges 1,216 1,155 1,242
IAS 19 timing adjustment 5/ -147
Retained gold endowment income 6 3/
Net income position 6/ 2,322 2,069 2,013
Fund credit (average stock, SDR billions) 100.6 93.3 91.9
SDR interest rate (average, in percent) 0.3 0.1 0.1
US$/SDR exchange rate (average) 1.55 1.55 1.52
Precautionary balances (end of period, SDR billions) 11.8 11.6 11.5
Memorandum Items:
FY 2013REVIEW OF THE FUND’S INCOME POSITION FOR FY 2013 AND FY 2014 
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 7
DISPOSITION DECISIONS 
4. Projected net income includes net operational income of about SDR 912 million and 
surcharge income of SDR 1.2 billion (Table 1). The Executive Board needs to consider the 
disposition of net income and the use of IA investment income, which may impact the 
determination of GRA net operational income. Each of these elements is discussed below, and 
presented in Figure 1, beginning with the disposition of IA investment income.
5. The IA has three subaccounts.
6
 Under the recent Board-approved Rules and Regulations 
for the IA, the IA has three separate subaccounts holding three portfolios of assets: (i) a fixedincome subaccount funded by transfers of currencies from the GRA in amounts equivalent to the 
Fund’s total reserves in June 2006, plus subsequent transfers of GRA net income not associated with 
gold profits; (ii) the endowment subaccount funded with gold profits (other than windfall profits) as 
part of the new income model aimed at diversifying the Fund’s sources of income; and (iii) the 
temporary windfall profits subaccount funded GRA currency transfers attributed to windfall gold 
profits, which is to be used to fund a partial distribution of the general reserve to the membership 
for the benefit of the Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust.7
6. The use of IA income is guided by the Fund’s Articles. Under the Articles, investment 
income from the IA may be invested, held in the IA, or used for meeting the expenses of conducting 
the business of the Fund.8
 Further, Article XII, Section 6(f)(ii), permits the transfer of GRA currencies 
to the IA when the Fund’s reserves are above the cumulative amount of previous transfers of 
currencies from the GRA to the IA. Accordingly, in prior years a two-step approach has been taken 
with respect to the fixed-income subaccount; first, a transfer of IA income from this subaccount to 
the GRA is made to meet administrative expenses, which increases net income, and in turn increases 
available resources for placement to the GRA reserves. Second, the increase in reserves provides 
scope for further transfers of GRA currencies to the IA, thereby expanding the corpus of the IA which 
has generally provided higher returns.
7. Staff proposes that income in the subaccounts of the IA be used as follows: 
 Fixed-Income Subaccount (reserves portfolio): Consistent with past practice, staff proposes that 
the estimated FY 2013 income of SDR 58 million be transferred to the GRA to be used towards 
meeting the expenses of the Fund (proposed Decision 5). By so doing the IA income will 
contribute to the GRA net operational income, which will be placed in the Fund’s reserves. 
6
 See Press Release No. 13/37 on the new rules and regulations of the Investment Account. 
7
 In September 2012, the Board approved the partial distribution of the general reserve in an amount equivalent to 
the remainder of the windfall gold profits of SDR 1.75 billion and that the distribution be funded through a reduction 
in IA assets attributed to these profits, subject to the receipt of satisfactory assurances that members will provide 
new PRGT subsidy contributions equivalent to at least 90 percent of the amount to be distributed. 
8
 Article XII, Section 6 (f)(iv). The Board could also, by a 70 percent majority of the total voting power, decide to 
reduce the principal invested in the IA (Article XII, Section 6 (f)(vi)). 

 

http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2013/043013a.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone please + dinardana for me. I'm using my phone and I accidentally hit the red. Sorry dinardana. I did like your quote

 

Awe thanks and a special thank you for being kind. Those tiny buttons are tough on our fingers.

 

I Plus her for ya but I agree too.

Thanks for covering for JMULS, community minded and kind! - :hug:

 

Now we need a watched pot as an emoticon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.