Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

O Admin Facing Massive Federal Lawsuit...


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
15 replies to this topic

#1 Francie26

Francie26

    Senior Member

  • Platinum VIP
  • 3,677 posts
  • LocationMid-Missouri


Posted 09 November 2012 - 05:16 PM

Wall St Journal Reports: O Admin Facing Massive Federal Lawsuit...

Learn more about what is allegedly the largest money laundering and racketeering scheme in history.
Obama Administration Facing Massive Federal Lawsuit
November 7, 2012 By Sean Francisco 8 Comments
inShare6

A lawsuit seeking the return of $43 trillion (with a “t”) and an audit of all the TARP programs by an independent receiver has been filed against senior members of the Obama Administration and the New York group known as the “Banksters”.
The Wall Street Journal’s MarketWatch is reporting that the Spire Law Group, LLP has moved its mass tort action into the federal court in Brooklyn, New York. In this District Court lawsuit (Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML), the Spire Law Group, LLP is acting on the behalf of homeowners across the country seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide until the return of the $43 trillion.

The independent audit the lawsuit is seeking of the TARP Program stems from a report by the former Inspector General of the bailout program, Neil Barofsky, who is countering the claims made by President Obama both publicly and privately to Congress that the money has been paid back. Mr. Barofsky asserts that none of the money advanced by the Treasury has ever been paid back by the recipients of the program.

The Plaintiffs have established the location of the $43 trillion of laundered money in a criminal racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals:

Eric Holder
Tony West
Kamala Harris
Jon Corzine
Robert Rubin
Timothy Geitner
Vikram Pandit
Valerie Jarrett
Anita Dunn
Robert Baueras

The lawsuit alleges that the Obama Administration actively borrowed money from these “Banksters” holding the money to fund his political campaign in this 2012 Election and the Atty General's office has not pursued any criminal charges against them (could it possibly be that Holder is also named in the lawsuit . . . Hmmm!!!)

The lawsuit also claims multiple violations of the United States Patriot Act, along with the Policy of Embargo Against Iran and Countries Hostile to the Foreign Policy of the United States, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and other State and Federal laws by the Obama Administration.
Wall Street Journal Market Watch Reporting:
Learn more about what is allegedly the largest money laundering and racketeering scheme in history.

There is a God!
  • 9

#2 endeavor1

endeavor1

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 383 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 05:43 PM

"Lord, please let this lawsuit win, We claim the victory in Jesus' name, Amen."
  • 2

#3 wpsmit

wpsmit

    wpsmit

  • Platinum VIP
  • 2,571 posts
  • LocationGeorgia, usa


Posted 09 November 2012 - 05:52 PM

Let's hope this is just the first in a long line of lawsuits. My biggest fear is that Executive Privilege will be illegally worn out on any and all lawsuits as it was in Fast and Furious.
  • 1

RV,RV,RV! SOMETIME IN MY LIFETIME


#4 skitealwedrop

skitealwedrop

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,895 posts
  • LocationDallas, TX

Posted 09 November 2012 - 06:32 PM

Hey Francie,

Do you have a link to the Wall Street Journal article that you are referring to? What state and county was the purported suit filed in?

Ski
  • 0

#5 pattyangel

pattyangel

    Senior Member

  • Platinum VIP
  • 3,625 posts


Posted 09 November 2012 - 06:55 PM

Wall St Journal Reports: O Admin Facing Massive Federal Lawsuit...


There is a God!

I wouldn't put it pass this administration or even surprise me, if they actively borrowed money to fund his campaign.

That's right Francie.... There is a God!
  • 1

#6 TPSprayduster

TPSprayduster

    He who is without sin, let him cast the first stone

  • Members
  • 3,217 posts
  • LocationSouthWest Texas


Posted 09 November 2012 - 07:00 PM

Hey Francie,

Do you have a link to the Wall Street Journal article that you are referring to? What state and county was the purported suit filed in?

Ski



http://www.westernjo...ederal-lawsuit/

This is what i found so far.

43 Trillion is a stretch in my opinion.

Edited by TPSprayduster, 09 November 2012 - 07:01 PM.

  • 1

#7 Francie26

Francie26

    Senior Member

  • Platinum VIP
  • 3,677 posts
  • LocationMid-Missouri


Posted 09 November 2012 - 07:21 PM

http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-administration-facing-massive-federal-lawsuit/

This is what i found so far.

43 Trillion is a stretch in my opinion.

This is where I found it, Sprayduster. Sorry I didn't include that information with the post.
  • 0

#8 TPSprayduster

TPSprayduster

    He who is without sin, let him cast the first stone

  • Members
  • 3,217 posts
  • LocationSouthWest Texas


Posted 09 November 2012 - 07:24 PM

This is where I found it, Sprayduster. Sorry I didn't include that information with the post.

No worries in my case. It is nice to include the link so for those who like to read in depth.
  • 0

#9 Gooserider67

Gooserider67

    Senior Member

  • Platinum VIP
  • 404 posts
  • LocationThe Great State of TEXAS


Posted 09 November 2012 - 07:35 PM

Anything that can be done to get this man out of the White House needs to be done.... the democratic lead senate and house of 2004 thru 2008 set the stage for the blame the Bush administration for the next decade and makes it easy for the dem's to demonize the RNC because they are not above playing dirty. the RNC is just too nice and will not portray the president for the man that he truly is "The Destroyer of America". GOD help us all the freedom loving people that we are....
  • 2
Huntin' Dogs Don't Kill Their Own....

#10 TAV

TAV

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 190 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 08:31 PM

http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-administration-facing-massive-federal-lawsuit/

This is what i found so far.

43 Trillion is a stretch in my opinion.



Yes, 43 Trillion is a big stretch, I don't believe this article one bit. The national debt is 16 trillion.......43 Trillion :rolleyes:
  • 0

#11 TAV

TAV

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 190 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 08:45 PM

Targets of Spire Law Group, LLP’s Racketeering and Money Laundering Lawsuit Seeking Return of $43 Trillion
to the United States Treasury

NEW YORK, Oct. 25, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ — Spire Law Group, LLP’s national home owners’ lawsuit, pending in the venue where the “Banksters” control their $43 trillion racketeering scheme (New York) – known as the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History and identifying $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money by the “Banksters” and their U.S. racketeering partners and joint venturers – now pinpoints the identities of the key racketeering partners of the “Banksters” located in the highest offices of government and acting for their own self-interests.

In connection with the federal lawsuit now impending in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, New York (Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML) – involving, among other things, a request that the District Court enjoin all mortgage foreclosures by the Banksters nationwide, unless and until the entire $43 trillion is repaid to a court-appointed receiver – Plaintiffs now establish the location of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money in a racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals (without limitation): Attorney General Holder acting in his individual capacity, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris (both acting in their individual capacities), Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary (acting in his individual capacity), Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former “communications director” for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the “Banksters” themselves, and their affiliates and conduits. The lawsuit alleges serial violations of the United States Patriot Act, the Policy of Embargo Against Iran and Countries Hostile to the Foreign Policy of the United States, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly known as the RICO statute) and other State and Federal laws.

Here are the preliminary flings:

USA Racketeering and Mortgage Fraud Case – Initial Filing
  • 0

#12 Markinsa

Markinsa

    Saved By The Blood!

  • Moderators
  • 6,019 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, TX


Posted 09 November 2012 - 08:49 PM

Oct. 25, 2012, 2:09 p.m. EDT


Major Banks, Governmental Officials and Their Comrade Capitalists Targets of Spire Law Group, LLP's Racketeering and Money Laundering Lawsuit Seeking Return of $43 Trillion to the United States Treasury


NEW YORK, Oct. 25, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Spire Law Group, LLP's national home owners' lawsuit, pending in the venue where the "Banksters" control their $43 trillion racketeering scheme (New York) - known as the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History and identifying $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money by the "Banksters" and their U.S. racketeering partners and joint venturers - now pinpoints the identities of the key racketeering partners of the "Banksters" located in the highest offices of government and acting for their own self-interests.

In connection with the federal lawsuit now impending in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, New York (Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML) - involving, among other things, a request that the District Court enjoin all mortgage foreclosures by the Banksters nationwide, unless and until the entire $43 trillion is repaid to a court-appointed receiver - Plaintiffs now establish the location of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money in a racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals (without limitation): Attorney General Holder acting in his individual capacity, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris (both acting in their individual capacities), Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary (acting in his individual capacity), Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former "communications director" for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the "Banksters" themselves, and their affiliates and conduits. The lawsuit alleges serial violations of the United States Patriot Act, the Policy of Embargo Against Iran and Countries Hostile to the Foreign Policy of the United States, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly known as the RICO statute) and other State and Federal laws.

In the District Court lawsuit, Spire Law Group, LLP -- on behalf of home owner across the Country and New York taxpayers, as well as under other taxpayer recompense laws -- has expanded its mass tort action into federal court in Brooklyn, New York, seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide pending the return of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000.00) by the "Banksters" and their co-conspirators, seeking an audit of the Fed and audits of all the "bailout programs" by an independent receiver such as Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other "bailout money" advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants as well as similar protestations by President Obama and the Obama Administration both publicly on national television and more privately to the United States Congress. Because the Obama Administration has failed to pursue any of the "Banksters" criminally, and indeed is actively borrowing monies for Mr. Obama's campaign from these same "Banksters" to finance its political aspirations, the national group of plaintiff home owners has been forced to now expand its lawsuit to include racketeering, money laundering and intentional violations of the Iranian Nations Sanctions and Embargo Act by the national banks included among the "Bankster" Defendants.

The complaint - which has now been fully served on thousands of the "Banksters and their Co-Conspirators" - makes it irrefutable that the epicenter of this laundering and racketeering enterprise has been and continues to be Wall Street and continues to involve the very "Banksters" located there who have repeatedly asked in the past to be "bailed out" and to be "bailed out" in the future.

The Havens for the money laundering schemes - and certain of the names and places of these entities - are located in such venues as Switzerland, the Isle of Man, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Cypress and entities controlled by governments adverse to the interests of the United States Sanctions and Embargo Act against Iran, and are also identified in both the United Nations and the U.S. Senate's recent reports on international money laundering. Many of these entities have already been personally served with summons and process of the complaint during the last six months. It is now beyond dispute that, while the Obama Administration was publicly encouraging loan modifications for home owners by "Banksters", it was privately ratifying the formation of these shell companies in violation of the United States Patriot Act, and State and Federal law. The case further alleges that through these obscure foreign companies, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo Bank, Citibank, Citigroup, One West Bank, and numerous other federally chartered banks stole trillions of dollars of home owners' and taxpayers' money during the last decade and then laundered it through offshore companies.

This District Court Complaint - maintained by Spire Law Group, LLP -- is the only lawsuit in the world listing as Defendants the Banksters, let alone serving all of such Banksters with legal process and therefore forcing them to finally answer the charges in court. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, nor the Office of the Attorney General, nor any State Attorney General has sued the Banksters and thereby legally chased them worldwide to recover-back the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) and other lawful damages, injunctive relief and other legal remedies.

James N. Fiedler, Managing Partner of Spire Law Group, LLP, stated: "It is hard for me to believe as a 47-year lawyer that our nation's guardians have been unwilling to stop this theft. Spire Law Group, LLP stands for the elimination of corruption and implementation of lawful strategies, and that is what we're doing here. Spire Law Group, LLP's charter is to not allow such corruption to go unanswered."

Comments were requested from the Attorney Generals' offices in NY, CA, NV, NH , OH, MA and the White House, but no comment was provided.

About Spire Law Group

Spire Law Group, LLP is a national law firm whose motto is "the public should be protected -- at all costs -- from corruption in whatever form it presents itself." The Firm is comprised of lawyers nationally with more than 250-years of experience in a span of matters ranging from representing large corporations and wealthy individuals, to also representing the masses. The Firm is at the front lines litigating against government officials, banks, defunct loan pools, and now the very offshore entities where the corruption was enabled and perpetrated.

Contact: James N. Fiedler
877-438-8766
http://spire-law.com

SOURCE Spire Law Group, LLP

Copyright © 2012 PR Newswire. All rights reserved
  • 0
Matthew 10:32-33 (NLT)

32 “Everyone who acknowledges me publicly here on earth, I will also acknowledge before my Father in heaven. 33 But everyone who denies me here on earth, I will also deny before my Father in heaven.

#13 dontlop

dontlop

    Dollarize~ RV ~ Dedollarize

  • Members
  • 7,493 posts
  • LocationStampeding cattle downtown with the cops chasing me

Posted 09 November 2012 - 09:03 PM

lots of my friends always had a hard time believing we lost trillions of dollars in the "meltdown".. it would have to go somewhere ..,its never lost .. either you never had it or it is somewhere but not "lost"

eletronic ..digital dollars when transfered always leave a trail .. it wasnt cash money .. the united states only has a little over 2 trillion in actual cash dollars .. yes 2 trillion ... maybe this is why they have been printing up so much cash latley so it can be laundered .. into cash . obama has printed up quite a bit ..

this could be what they have been waiting for ... the laundering process .. and have been following its trail for the past few years ..

just simply blaming bush doesnt cut it ..they have to spell out what policies bush put into place to be blaming him .. ya just cant keep saying bush did it ..


and when the president repeats those claims .. while bush sits quietly ..hmmm . bush may of been silent for a reason .. you never speak about on going investigations.. and im sure bush has his people investigating to clear his name..

i definatly will be following this ..
  • 1

#14 NMGarand

NMGarand

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 162 posts
  • Locationtable9a&b gunneryrange

Posted 09 November 2012 - 09:38 PM

The law makes no decisions. It has no will of it's own.
It's like a weapon, or a tool: it works for those who pick it up
and use it. It can be used for or against anything or anyone.
Pedantry, or the lack of, is the deciding factor that defines the use of the rule
of law: for the benefit of, or the detriment of those things or
persons who find themselves at the center of the prosecution
of that rule being employed. Pedantry itself is the only crime I know of
that I've never seen prosecuted by anyone. But I haven't seen everything,
naturally.

NMGarand
  • 0

#15 jonjon

jonjon

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,979 posts
  • LocationAthens, Texas

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:25 PM

Posted Image
  • 1

#16 dontlop

dontlop

    Dollarize~ RV ~ Dedollarize

  • Members
  • 7,493 posts
  • LocationStampeding cattle downtown with the cops chasing me

Posted 10 November 2012 - 09:37 PM

The law makes no decisions. It has no will of it's own.
It's like a weapon, or a tool: it works for those who pick it up
and use it. It can be used for or against anything or anyone.
Pedantry, or the lack of, is the deciding factor that defines the use of the rule
of law: for the benefit of, or the detriment of those things or
persons who find themselves at the center of the prosecution
of that rule being employed. Pedantry itself is the only crime I know of
that I've never seen prosecuted by anyone. But I haven't seen everything,
naturally.

NMGarand

nice quote
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

  • Privacy Policy