45 replies to this topic

[DinarDiva007]

The few liberals on this site that are claiming to be supporters of Ron Paul won’t be watched when they pull the lever for the DNC on Election Day. Their agenda to split the conservatives of this country is very well planned. Their campaign is waged and we get to watch it play out here …………. Live …………… It’s Liberalism at it’s best

Oh Wow you know how to copy and paste, LOL so do I. That is the most riduculous statement I have ever heard....

[divemaster5734]

Oh Wow you know how to copy and paste, LOL so do I. That is the most riduculous statement I have ever heard....

It is a really stupid statement, ESPECIALLY if you consider what Ron Paul said.

His entire message is about working within the establishment to bring about a fundamental paradigm shift.

Never once did Ron Paul, or myself, say anything about writing in a separate candidate.

That is just the "O trolls" acting like rupugnants (my new word for the day describing establishment republicans) and trying to disrupt any positive momentum.

They obviously don't bother to check content or even bother to actually think before opening their mouth and spewing nonsense.

Checked my inbox, and got my email this morning. Boy, that man certainly does sound sincere. Sounds to be a true American patriot and a man who believes in what he is saying. Don't see any flip-flopping going on here, he's just telling it like it is. Let's keep the Marxist and the Havaianas
candidates on their toes!

Amen.

[TPSprayduster]

It is a really stupid statement, ESPECIALLY if you consider what Ron Paul said.

His entire message is about working within the establishment to bring about a fundamental paradigm shift.

Never once did Ron Paul, or myself, say anything about writing in a separate candidate.

That is just the "O trolls" acting like rupugnants (my new word for the day describing establishment republicans) and trying to disrupt any positive momentum.

They obviously don't bother to check content or even bother to actually think before opening their mouth and spewing nonsense.



Amen.

i posted a article about how the RP folks operate so i will leave it at that. You already showed us how short of a fuse you have.

http://dinarvets.com/forums/index.php?/topic/120366-ron-paul-supporters-and-cyber-bullies-stop-the-hate/

Edited by TPSprayduster, 16 June 2012 - 10:55 AM.

[Scrumdiddles]

i posted a article about how the RP folks operate so i will leave it at that. You already showed us how short of a fuse you have.

http://dinarvets.com...-stop-the-hate/

It is not the attitude we have. It is the ignorant thing you say to portray a falsehood of the truth. TPS i am calling you out as a LIER. You are a LIER TPSprayduster.

[cris]

In my opinion, Pauls analogy to the Vietnam war is right on target.
He has lost every battle & is asking the GOP to end their support for Romney.
Its not going to happen, the subversion and chaos will be a fight right up to
the Convention. And the Demo's cant save them this time, by pulling
support from the opposition
Allowing Paulers to impose delegates in place of what the people voted for,
is like allowing the communists to invade S. Vietnam......its an easy choice,
They didnt win the votes, they dont belong at the Convention.
Suing to vote your 'conscience' is a pitiful ploy, and should be summarily
tossed out of court.
Is it conscientious to become a delegate, all the time knowing you will be voting
for the Paul Campaign....no....Is it conscientious to thwart the will of 'the people'
in your district by illegally voting against them...nope.....Is it an underhanded ploy
to disrupt the Convention, leading to another 4 years of O'blah?...probably.
The GOP is doing exactly the right thing, by forcing the intruding Paulers to sign
a loyalty pledge, under penalty of perjury. And threatening to exclude those
who will vote in a way opposite of their constituents.
The battle will obviously continue, the war will be won, and the rights of the
normal, everyday, Republican will be upheld.

[divemaster5734]

Allowing Paulers to impose delegates in place of what the people voted for,
is like allowing the communists to invade S. Vietnam......its an easy choice,
They didnt win the votes, they dont belong at the Convention.
Suing to vote your 'conscience' is a pitiful ploy, and should be summarily
tossed out of court.
Is it conscientious to become a delegate, all the time knowing you will be voting
for the Paul Campaign....no....Is it conscientious to thwart the will of 'the people'
in your district by illegally voting against them...nope....

Really?

That is EXACTLY OPPOSITE of the truth.

Why do you refuse to see it??
Why are you so determined to continue to "misunderstand"?

The GOP forced states to agree to bind a minimum of 2/3 of the delegates to Romney otherwise they would not be "recognized" at the convention.


In case you still don't get it, THAT'S CHEATING!!!!

The GOP was caught altering the primaries results, changing the caucus rules, and threatening to disqualify anyone that supports Ron Paul by any excuse they could find.

And you are ballyhooing about people standing up for themselves?

Why? Why do you demand the GOP be allowed to use corruption to influence the vote?

Why do you demand to be continuously oppressed?

Aren't you tired of your slavery to the tyrants and globalists?

Why can't you even read a single story and get it straight without twisting it into the exact opposite of the truth?

Please tell me, besides spreading lies from your home computer what else are you going to do this weekend to help promote personal freedom and individual responsibility?

Oh yeah, nothing, thought so...

Edited by divemaster5734, 16 June 2012 - 12:29 PM.

[Scrumdiddles]

Really?

That is EXACTLY OPPOSITE of the truth.

Why do you refuse to see it??
Why are you so determined to continue to "misunderstand"?

The GOP forced states to agree to bind a minimum of 2/3 of the delegates to Romney otherwise they would not be "recognized" at the convention.


In case you still don't get it, THAT'S CHEATING!!!!

The GOP was caught altering the primaries results, changing the caucus rules, and threatening to disqualify anyone that supports Ron Paul by any excuse they could find.

And you are ballyhooing about people standing up for themselves?

Why? Why do you demand the GOP be allowed to use corruption to influence the vote?

Why do you demand to be continuously oppressed?

Aren't you tired of your slavery to the tyrants and globalists?

Why can't you even read a single story and get it straight without twisting it into the exact opposite of the truth?

Please tell me, besides spreading lies from your home computer what else are you going to do this weekend to help promote personal freedom and individual responsibility?

Oh yeah, nothing, thought so...

This also goes for you TPSprayduster and jonjon. I could not have said it better myself.

[64jaguar]

Really?

That is EXACTLY OPPOSITE of the truth.

Why do you refuse to see it??
Why are you so determined to continue to "misunderstand"?

The GOP forced states to agree to bind a minimum of 2/3 of the delegates to Romney otherwise they would not be "recognized" at the convention.


In case you still don't get it, THAT'S CHEATING!!!!

The GOP was caught altering the primaries results, changing the caucus rules, and threatening to disqualify anyone that supports Ron Paul by any excuse they could find.

And you are ballyhooing about people standing up for themselves?

Why? Why do you demand the GOP be allowed to use corruption to influence the vote?

Why do you demand to be continuously oppressed?

Aren't you tired of your slavery to the tyrants and globalists?

Why can't you even read a single story and get it straight without twisting it into the exact opposite of the truth?

Please tell me, besides spreading lies from your home computer what else are you going to do this weekend to help promote personal freedom and individual responsibility?

Oh yeah, nothing, thought so...

Amen Brother.. knew this would get them going!!

[cris]

Sorry Divemaster, while I agree with you on a lot of subjects,
this is not one of them.

Which states are we talking about? The states where Paul got
10% of the vote? This ground was covered 2 months ago on this
site....The conclusion is that delegates must vote in the manner
that 'the people' they represent voted.....In most cases, thats 70%
or better.

Should Romney lose in the first round, the delegates can vote
in any way they wish.

The first round, they are obligated to actually represent the voters.
Any other misrepresentation of the will of the voters, should be
prosecuted IMO.

As far as the accusations of the Paulers, I dont believe them
for a second.....I guess we'll see how truthful they are when we get
the results from the lawsuit.

The attempts of the Paulers to subvert the Convention and create
chaos, to vote their 'conscience' is not in any way patriotic. If you
check out the entire stated objectives of the Paul campaign, you'll
see that its almost entirely a Liberal agenda.

Im not interested in allowing the Liberals to further subvert the
Conservative party.....What I am interested in, is a business friendly
environment to work in.

Romney brings that to the table, his campaign is economy oriented,
while I've never seen Paul talk about the subject at all.

Im not asleep, Im not twisting, Im not lying.....I do have a different
opinion of Paul, and you are wrong in suggesting that Im doing nothing
to further freedom and individual responsibility.....I do that every day,
in my own way......and Im pretty good at it.

[Scrumdiddles]

Sorry Divemaster, while I agree with you on a lot of subjects,
this is not one of them.

Which states are we talking about? The states where Paul got
10% of the vote? This ground was covered 2 months ago on this
site....The conclusion is that delegates must vote in the manner
that 'the people' they represent voted.....In most cases, thats 70%
or better.


These primaries and caucuses are not for the popular vote, it has nothing to do with electing the candidate. It has everything to do with delegates. Stop focusing on a lie cris, you are confused.


Should Romney lose in the first round, the delegates can vote
in any way they wish.

The first round, they are obligated to actually represent the voters.
Any other misrepresentation of the will of the voters, should be
prosecuted IMO.

Twisting the truth to fit your agenda, cris. That is a bold face lie. According to the US Code and lawsuit that prove what you are saying is a lie.
Lawsuit - http://www.law.corne.../94-203.ZO.html
US Code - http://www.gpo.gov/f...l1-sec100-2.xml

As far as the accusations of the Paulers, I dont believe them
for a second.....I guess we'll see how truthful they are when we get
the results from the lawsuit.

Twisting the truth again, cris. They are filing the lawsuit because the GOP has done illegal thing during the election.

The attempts of the Paulers to subvert the Convention and create
chaos, to vote their 'conscience' is not in any way patriotic. If you
check out the entire stated objectives of the Paul campaign, you'll
see that its almost entirely a Liberal agenda.


Ron Paul delegates will cause chaos when there are illegal things going on to ensure that rules and laws are being followed. Lie again cris.

Im not interested in allowing the Liberals to further subvert the
Conservative party.....What I am interested in, is a business friendly
environment to work in.

Romney brings that to the table, his campaign is economy oriented,
while I've never seen Paul talk about the subject at all.


Im not asleep, Im not twisting, Im not lying.....I do have a different
opinion of Paul, and you are wrong in suggesting that Im doing nothing
to further freedom and individual responsibility.....I do that every day,
in my own way......and Im pretty good at it.

[cris]

The primaries and caucuses can be binding or nonbinding in allocating delegates to the respective state delegations to the national convention.

Delegate Hard Count This only includes bound delegates that have to vote for a candidate even if they support another candidate.
Delegate Soft Count: This only includes delegates allocated at the primaries and unallocated delegates that are (s)elected at their local conventions or committees. It does not included any projections on future local conventions or the 117 unbound RNC delegates that are not a part of the primary election process. A breakdown of this count and its sources can be found in the Primary Schedule below.

Romney.......Hard count 1338.......Soft count 1398

Paul.............Hard count 101.........Soft count 143

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_presidential_primaries,_2012

Who is the liar now scrum?......If you cant get the facts, twist
and squirm around trying to subvert the truth....good job buddy

[Scrumdiddles]

The primaries and caucuses can be binding or nonbinding in allocating delegates to the respective state delegations to the national convention.

Delegate Hard Count This only includes bound delegates that have to vote for a candidate even if they support another candidate.
Delegate Soft Count: This only includes delegates allocated at the primaries and unallocated delegates that are (s)elected at their local conventions or committees. It does not included any projections on future local conventions or the 117 unbound RNC delegates that are not a part of the primary election process. A breakdown of this count and its sources can be found in the Primary Schedule below.

Romney.......Hard count 1338.......Soft count 1398

Paul.............Hard count 101.........Soft count 143

http://en.wikipedia....ntial_primaries,_2012

Who is the liar now scrum?......If you cant get the facts, twist
and squirm around trying to subvert the truth....good job buddy

Ok cris you bring wikipedia and i bring US Code and Superior Court Lawsuits. Whatever.

[cris]

Ok cris you bring wikipedia and i bring US Code and Superior Court Lawsuits. Whatever.

If you look hard enough....It'll take about 60 seconds, you'll see
the reference that I brought is current rules regarding this election.

The references you brought.....the (US code) is irrelevant to the argument,
and a law suit from (1996) is also irrelevant.....thanks for playing.

Delegates are bound, and will vote in the manner that their constituents
wish.....I've shown that. Bringing obscure lawsuits to the discussion
will not nullify the facts.

Wishful, hopeful thinking will not unbind delegates.
Filing goofy lawsuits will not unbind them, I applaud the
GOP for forcing them to sign a loyalty oath to their constituents

[Scrumdiddles]

Broken down barney style for your truth rejecting mind.

[cris]

Thats his 'opinion'....He's wrong IMO
We'll see soon....also, keep it civil scrum.....your
bordering on breaking the rules again...I wont hesitate
to report any further nasty comments.....such as, I am a liar,
or that I need things broken down Barney style....watch your
mouth buddy

[Scrumdiddles]

Thats his 'opinion'....He's wrong IMO
We'll see soon....also, keep it civil scrum.....your
bordering on breaking the rules again...I wont hesitate
to report any further nasty comments.....such as, I am a liar,
or that I need things broken down Barney style....watch your
mouth buddy

The truth hurts when you are a lier and things need to broken down to simplest term so you can understand them. Well calling you a lier is not calling names cris, it is labeling you as a lier, because you are and many have pointed that out before me. But you have blood on your mind and want to see Ron Paul supporters gone from this site. You are sad little buddy.

[jonjon]

Cris
These snipers aren’t going to come out of their ghillie suits and admit their liberal campaign. One of the major differences in the left and right is the people on the right are honest.
Nothing any of these clowns have ever posted was based in reality.

[cris]

Cris
These snipers aren’t going to come out of their ghillie suits and admit their liberal campaign. One of the major differences in the left and right is the people on the right are honest.
Nothing any of these clowns have ever posted was based in reality.

Agreed.....Im also doing a google of Matt Larsen of Fight4Freedom.
This guy has no credentials that I can find.....either of being an attorney
or of having any sort of legal experience.
Its the kind of thing that scrum likes to bring to muddy the waters....Matt Larsen
looks to be a 20 something agitator, like his fellows in the Wall Street debacle

The truth hurts when you are a lier and things need to broken down to simplest term so you can understand them. Well calling you a lier is not calling names cris, it is labeling you as a lier, because you are and many have pointed that out before me. But you have blood on your mind and want to see Ron Paul supporters gone from this site. You are sad little buddy.

As I've said I would, I went ahead and reported your language.
I wont be replying to anything else you say, but wont hesitate to
report your abuses.

[Scrumdiddles]

As I've said I would, I went ahead and reported your language.
I wont be replying to anything else you say, but wont hesitate to
report your abuses.

Diddo.

[cris]

Diddo.

Its 'ditto'....also its 'liar' not lier