Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

GOOD CHANCE OBAMA & MALIKI ARE GOING TO BURN ALL US DINAR INVESTORS , IT COULD BE A SECRET AGENDA


  • Please log in to reply
59 replies to this topic

#41 the wolf

the wolf

    Advanced Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 46 posts

Posted 11 April 2012 - 01:17 PM

the Rothschilds banking cartel own the CBI..Obama's got nothing to do with the Iraqi Dinar....if Iraq was really headed for civil war, do you think Shell and Exxon would be inking multi-BILLION dollar oil contracts? So much investment money is pouring into Iraq monthly, it truly is staggering. The Iraqi government sideshow is just that, a bunch of puppets trying to be 1st at the trough,,,the Iraq government did not conceive of this plan with their currency, nor are they in control of it. BANKSTERS run everything.



What makes you think the Rothchilds own the CBI?

http://cbi.iq/documents/CBILAW-EN_f.pdf

See page 11 from the CBI banking law. It explains it pretty clearly.


You are correct that Obama has nothing to do with it.

Edited by the wolf, 11 April 2012 - 01:18 PM.

  • 0

#42 uncirculd

uncirculd

    Walking Liberty Lady

  • Members
  • 6,047 posts
  • LocationGone


Posted 11 April 2012 - 01:25 PM

WERE IS THE STATE DEPARTMENT , WHERE IS THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION . IRAQI IS RIPE FOR A CIVIL WAR . THIS CAN BE SCAM PUT ON BY THE FED AND THE CENTRAL BANKERS . WHO'S STOPING MALIKI ?? NOBODY !!! SURE THERE MAYBE A VOTE OF NO CONFIDENCE . THE POWER STRUGGLE HAS ALREDY BEEN DECIDED . IT COULD BE A WAY OUT FOR THE BANKERS . SOMETHING AIN'T RIGHT HERE . WE KNOW MALIKI'S BACK TO THE WALL BUT SOMETHING TELLS ME OBAMA'S AND BANKERS HAVE SOMETHING UP THERE SLEVES . THEY ALL COULD POSSIBLY BE ROBBING ALL US BLIND , AND KEEP US ALL AS SLAVES . MALIKI NEEDS TO BE STOPPED DEAD IN HIS TRACKS NOW , TAKE OVER THE CBI MY ASS !!!!!!!!!! THOUGHTS PLEASE , PEACE TO ALL AND HAPPY EASTER !


Calm down. Dang you sound like me when I know something to be true and fight for it. Iraq is not ripe for a civil war. They are ripe for a democracy. Look at this. Think about it. If they didn't call out the crooks and let it go, it would then comes to a big bubble and burst. This bickering has been going on and they don't want it bigger. Maliki is going to be stopped one way or another. If we are reading all this stuff what do you think they know that we don't. There was another article on 2 other bodyguards of Hashemi were also tortured. If they are talking about it, they are fixing to do something about it. Don't panic. You'll get others panicking. It's not going without being see and heard and dealt with. You know by now they are slow at everything. They will get where they need to. It's not a plot of the bankers to burn us. He will NOT take over the CBI. It is his wishes to take over all of Iraq, but they know and they are fixin to stop him. It just ain't fast enough for us. But really, calm down. It ain't over yet and give them time. They don't look at it like we do. I hope this helps your worried mind.
  • 0

#43 thegente

thegente

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,190 posts

Posted 11 April 2012 - 01:25 PM

What makes you think the Rothchilds own the CBI?

http://cbi.iq/documents/CBILAW-EN_f.pdf

See page 11 from the CBI banking law. It explains it pretty clearly.


You are correct that Obama has nothing to do with it.


Google "Rothschilds and Central Banks" and do some research...they own/control nearly every Central Bank on the planet...it's old news. It's not going to be on paper at the CBI....while you're at it, look at the countries that have been invaded in within the last decade, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya...pre-invasion, they all had state-owned banks, but now have Central Banks controlled by the Rothschilds and their partners. There are only 3 countries left on earth that have banks that are independant of this cartel: Iran, South Korea, and Cuba. Do little digging, it's amazing once you connect the dots..
  • 0

#44 the wolf

the wolf

    Advanced Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 46 posts

Posted 11 April 2012 - 01:29 PM

Google "Rothschilds and Central Banks" and do some research...they own/control nearly every Central Bank on the planet...it's old news. It's not going to be on paper at the CBI....while you're at it, look at the countries that have been invaded in within the last decade, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya...pre-invasion, they all had state-owned banks, but now have Central Banks controlled by the Rothschilds and their partners. There are only 3 countries left on earth that have banks that are independant of this cartel: Iran, South Korea, and Cuba. Do little digging, it's amazing once you connect the dots..



I have researched it quite a bit and a lot more than just a :"google". Have you? The Rothchild in control of Central Banks is a conspiracy. I suppose you think they own our Federal Reserve as well? Any proof of any of it?
  • 0

#45 thegente

thegente

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,190 posts

Posted 11 April 2012 - 01:34 PM

I have researched it quite a bit and a lot more than just a :"google". Have you? The Rothchild in control of Central Banks is a conspiracy. I suppose you think they own our Federal Reserve as well? Any proof of any of it?



Yes I have done more than "google" it....I don't have the time to try and convince you otherwise, believe what you wish...I've seen more than enough proof with my own eyes to convince me otherwise. Could care less whether you see it or not...
  • 1

#46 armondtoth

armondtoth

    Registered and Approved!

  • Members
  • 482 posts

Posted 11 April 2012 - 01:41 PM

so does that mean +1 job created zero's out the -28,000,000 jobs lost. I don't think so. Its like making your checking account go into the negative by $300 by putting $1 dollar back in does not make the negative go away.
  • 1

#47 the wolf

the wolf

    Advanced Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 46 posts

Posted 11 April 2012 - 02:52 PM

Yes I have done more than "google" it....I don't have the time to try and convince you otherwise, believe what you wish...I've seen more than enough proof with my own eyes to convince me otherwise. Could care less whether you see it or not...


didn't think you had any proof
  • -1

#48 thegente

thegente

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,190 posts

Posted 11 April 2012 - 03:16 PM

didn't think you had any proof



Like I said, there's more than ample proof if you take the time to read up on your own...just because you can't connect the dots and see the big picture, doesn't mean it isn't true. if you wish to continue thru life with blinders on, that's entirely up to you.
  • 0

#49 zigmeister

zigmeister

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 6,587 posts


Posted 11 April 2012 - 08:47 PM

What makes you so afraid of hearing anything other than a go-RV viewpoint that you resort to this sort of nonsense?

I'm not responsible for your limited imagination. I am in front of a computer a lot (I'm a programmer) so its easy to take a quick look. I was in it for about 11 months, and no I am certain I made a good choice by getting out when I did. The only better choice would have been to not get in, but back then the Koolaid tasted soooo good.


HAHAHAHA! Your a kick you know that? I actually would be surprised you even owned dinar. You probably hang out at Wedding Chat groups, and tell them you were married once, but now your not, and your glad you got out of the whole thing. So you warn them about marriage and receptions, and honeymoons. HAHAHAHA! I bet you do.
  • 0

#50 the wolf

the wolf

    Advanced Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 46 posts

Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:13 AM

Like I said, there's more than ample proof if you take the time to read up on your own...just because you can't connect the dots and see the big picture, doesn't mean it isn't true. if you wish to continue thru life with blinders on, that's entirely up to you.


So based on your theory of the Rothchild's owning the CBI. Do you think they are going to want to have to pay out Trillions of dollars of their vast fortune to make you and everyone else rich? That doesn't sound like a very good business plan for such a wealthy familiy and there is no way to avoid having to pay that out if there is a 1000x increase in value. Do you know that dinar held by the CBI is not included in their M1 or M2 figures? They only have 60 or 70 billion in reserves so the rest would need to come out of pocket.
  • 0

#51 thegente

thegente

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,190 posts

Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:03 AM

So based on your theory of the Rothchild's owning the CBI. Do you think they are going to want to have to pay out Trillions of dollars of their vast fortune to make you and everyone else rich? That doesn't sound like a very good business plan for such a wealthy familiy and there is no way to avoid having to pay that out if there is a 1000x increase in value. Do you know that dinar held by the CBI is not included in their M1 or M2 figures? They only have 60 or 70 billion in reserves so the rest would need to come out of pocket.



First off, I never, ever said that the dinar would make anyone rich, and didn't buy mine on that suppsition. I felt a somewhat decent profit could be made from it. Secondly, No one knows what will happen when something eventually does happen with the IQD. All articles and evidence support an RD, and I'll take what I make and never look back. Lastly, and just think about this for a minute: What if this was a plan for the Rothschilds and their bankster pals to make a bundle, and we were never, ever supposed to hear about it? There is a lot going on that we are not at all privy to...
  • 0

#52 desimo

desimo

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,484 posts


Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:03 AM

I am not so convinced that Obama controlls the RV but I do strongly believe that if Obama thought he could benefit by selling the US for a quarter and a good cup of coffee that he would not think twice before doing it.
  • 0

#53 Danan

Danan

    Senior Member

  • Platinum VIP
  • 1,320 posts
  • LocationNow Central Texas


Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:25 AM

I am not so convinced that Obama controlls the RV but I do strongly believe that if Obama thought he could benefit by selling the US for a quarter and a good cup of coffee that he would not think twice before doing it.

You mean he hasn't already?

And to THE GENTE, why would you want to come on here and try and discourage people who already have the dinar? I personally think that is a mean spirited way to take hope away from people who own the Dinar. if you no longer own Dinar why don't you just go to one of the other websites that believe it is happening tomorrow and burst their bubble. Oh, that's right, you have probably already been kicked off those sites, please go away and let us worry about whether we did or did not make a sound investment.
  • 0
Life is not a remote. Get up and change it.

#54 Luigi1

Luigi1

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,028 posts

Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:35 AM

The Pelosi Bill was killed in 2009. That Bill called for a one time tax of 80% on the rich, windfall profits, inheritance & investements. The IQD RV would fall under windfall investements. There are calls to revive the Pelosi Bill. The timing is just in time for the global currency re-set including the IQD.

Even if the Obama Administration don't screw the investors, he will tax them out of existance. Could it be, the IQD was requested to be delayed by the powers that be while the new tax codes are in preparation.
  • 0

#55 the wolf

the wolf

    Advanced Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 46 posts

Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:48 AM

First off, I never, ever said that the dinar would make anyone rich, and didn't buy mine on that suppsition. I felt a somewhat decent profit could be made from it. Secondly, No one knows what will happen when something eventually does happen with the IQD. All articles and evidence support an RD, and I'll take what I make and never look back. Lastly, and just think about this for a minute: What if this was a plan for the Rothschilds and their bankster pals to make a bundle, and we were never, ever supposed to hear about it? There is a lot going on that we are not at all privy to...



my mistake, I assumed you were in the 1000x increase crowd and I should not have. I would agree with your goal of a modest return and I think it can. 100% of the profits of the CBI go to the state and 100% of the profits of the Federal Reserve go to the US Treasury so I still can't see how it would be of value to them....
  • 0

#56 thegente

thegente

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,190 posts

Posted 15 April 2012 - 12:34 PM

You mean he hasn't already?

And to THE GENTE, why would you want to come on here and try and discourage people who already have the dinar? I personally think that is a mean spirited way to take hope away from people who own the Dinar. if you no longer own Dinar why don't you just go to one of the other websites that believe it is happening tomorrow and burst their bubble. Oh, that's right, you have probably already been kicked off those sites, please go away and let us worry about whether we did or did not make a sound investment.



WHAT in the heck are you talking about? I'm not trying to discourage anyone with regards to the Dinar as an investment...I own plenty of dinar, and believe there will be a return on our investment, just not so sure it will be 1000 to 3000% as many of the gurus are saying. None of us really knows how this will turn out in the end, and I really don't appeciate you insinuating theat I've been kicked off any other sites, (which I haven't) or telling me to "go away" simply for having a differing viewpoint than you may. I think a return of 1000 to 3000% would be great, but to pin all your hopes on this invesment going down exactly that way, is simply delusional.

my mistake, I assumed you were in the 1000x increase crowd and I should not have. I would agree with your goal of a modest return and I think it can. 100% of the profits of the CBI go to the state and 100% of the profits of the Federal Reserve go to the US Treasury so I still can't see how it would be of value to them....


There is quite a bit i'm sure were aren't seeing with this investment, but we will all find out sooner or later (hopefully), hahaha!! Thx
  • 2

#57 Hell froze over

Hell froze over

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 351 posts

Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:04 AM

It wouldn't surprise me in the least if they where doing just that. :angry: The OBAMA ADMINISTRATION are full of surprises.


no bama lover but can you get your head around the fact that mc cain and palin and how she would be really letting them bankers have it allright while mc cain rested.
  • 0

#58 Hell froze over

Hell froze over

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 351 posts

Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:19 AM

What makes you think the Rothchilds own the CBI?

http://cbi.iq/docume...CBILAW-EN_f.pdf

See page 11 from the CBI banking law. It explains it pretty clearly.


You are correct that Obama has nothing to do with it.


you are wrong he has the final say on release of events granted and signed off on.he was voted into office as the new commander in chief of a military at war with a hostile country. provisions are not all U.N. we fought the war not the U.N. And if hes using it as a september spring board thats what he will do he is the one guy that grants its release yea read my post 16 months ago when i said it then and you all got your rv panties in a really bad spot then.
  • 0

#59 Francie26

Francie26

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,218 posts
  • LocationMid-Missouri


Posted 16 April 2012 - 03:00 AM

you are wrong he has the final say on release of events granted and signed off on.he was voted into office as the new commander in chief of a military at war with a hostile country. provisions are not all U.N. we fought the war not the U.N. And if hes using it as a september spring board thats what he will do he is the one guy that grants its release yea read my post 16 months ago when i said it then and you all got your rv panties in a really bad spot then.

Your writing would hold more authority if you would use capitol letters, periods, commas and other puntuation. By the way, I read your attachment and I disagree with you, but that has nothing to do with the fact that you lose authority when you don't punctuate to clarify your sentences and their content.
Example:
You are wrong. He has the final say on release of events granted and signed off on. He was voted into office as the new commander-in-chief of a military at war with a hostile country. Provisions are not all U.N. We fought the war, not the U.N> And if he's using it as a September spring board, that's what he will do. He is the one guy who grants its release. Yea. Read my post 16 months ago when I said it then, and you got your RV panties in a really bad spot then.
  • -1

#60 vvalley

vvalley

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 421 posts
  • LocationIndiana


Posted 16 April 2012 - 06:26 AM

Your writing would hold more authority if you would use capitol letters, periods, commas and other puntuation. By the way, I read your attachment and I disagree with you, but that has nothing to do with the fact that you lose authority when you don't punctuate to clarify your sentences and their content.
Example:
You are wrong. He has the final say on release of events granted and signed off on. He was voted into office as the new commander-in-chief of a military at war with a hostile country. Provisions are not all U.N. We fought the war, not the U.N> And if he's using it as a September spring board, that's what he will do. He is the one guy who grants its release. Yea. Read my post 16 months ago when I said it then, and you got your RV panties in a really bad spot then.


...Oh come on now, this is NOT English class here! :P
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

  • Privacy Policy