Edited by dvforumuser, 02 March 2012 - 08:49 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted 02 March 2012 - 08:47 PM
Edited by dvforumuser, 02 March 2012 - 08:49 PM.
Posted 02 March 2012 - 08:49 PM
haha..... My grand father retired as a CSM from the Army..where he was in the last horse drawn 1 CAL..... then joined the Air Force and retired a CSMAF (President Reagan served under him and remained friends till his death in 1987) and Nancy Reagan came to the funeral to see my grandmother who where good friends
So when you say its Illegal ...Thats JUST FOR YOU....NOT ME
Ya im that guy......so get it right
Posted 02 March 2012 - 09:06 PM
here you go numnuts
I guess now your gona say i just got back from the museum
Idiots
Posted 02 March 2012 - 09:09 PM
No, you simply took another person's photo and used it...
Do you really think that there is more than 1 $100,000 note with the serial number of A00020109A?
The same serial number that is on the Flickr photo which is shown to be from the Smithsonian National Museum of American History in D.C. is on the note that you just claimed to just take a picture of...
Oh, by the way... The image you appeared to have used for your latest BS is the same as this LINK
The only difference is that this time you thought that changing the file name would make it harder to locate the source of your attempted deception. Didn't matter though, you weren't able to change the serial number anyway...![]()
![]()
![]()
Ouch... That's gotta burn...
Posted 02 March 2012 - 10:54 PM
No, you simply took another person's photo and used it...
Do you really think that there is more than 1 $100,000 note with the serial number of A00020109A?
The same serial number that is on the Flickr photo which is shown to be from the Smithsonian National Museum of American History in D.C. is on the note that you just claimed to just take a picture of...
Oh, by the way... The image you appeared to have used for your latest BS is the same as this LINK
The only difference is that this time you thought that changing the file name would make it harder to locate the source of your attempted deception. Didn't matter though, you weren't able to change the serial number anyway...![]()
![]()
![]()
Ouch... That's gotta burn...
AHH you may want to read here fela .....This image depicts a unit of currency issued by the United States of America. If this is an image of paper currency or a coin not listed here, it is solely a work of the United States government, is ineligible for copyright, and is therefore in the public domain.No, you simply took another person's photo and used it...
Do you really think that there is more than 1 $100,000 note with the serial number of A00020109A?
The same serial number that is on the Flickr photo which is shown to be from the Smithsonian National Museum of American History in D.C. is on the note that you just claimed to just take a picture of...
Oh, by the way... The image you appeared to have used for your latest BS is the same as this LINK
The only difference is that this time you thought that changing the file name would make it harder to locate the source of your attempted deception. Didn't matter though, you weren't able to change the serial number anyway...![]()
![]()
![]()
Ouch... That's gotta burn...
Posted 02 March 2012 - 10:57 PM
so show me these serial numbers on the photo
Posted 02 March 2012 - 10:57 PM
so show me these serial numbers on the photo
Posted 02 March 2012 - 11:05 PM
Huh? If you have the bill to look at why are you having to ask where the serial number is located? It would be right there in front of you...
![]()
Here's a hint... It's on the front of the note...
Edited by randalln, 02 March 2012 - 11:00 PM.
Posted 02 March 2012 - 11:07 PM
Ya i now the note number
show me theses numbers that you say match somebodies photo
I just took that pic .....match the number
Posted 02 March 2012 - 11:17 PM
Ya i now the note number
show me theses numbers that you say match somebodies photo
I just took that pic .....match the number
my dad said the last time this bill was out on tour was 09' and that happen wail i was in Afghanistan
and there are only 3 -4 left that the US track
300+ are still unaccounted for
so where yall get your knowledge .....you need too check your source
Edited by dinarck, 02 March 2012 - 11:20 PM.
Posted 02 March 2012 - 11:57 PM
Posted 03 March 2012 - 08:49 AM
Posted 03 March 2012 - 04:32 PM
The US didn't start removing the large denominations in the 1940s, they simply stopped printing them then. They didn't start to remove them from circulation until almost 1970... And there are still a lot of high denomination notes still in circulation and are still legal tender, so completely different situations.
The US wasn't removing those notes to reduce the volume of currency in circulation as Iraq has stated their intent is to do.
On a side note since the large denominations in the US was brought up, many try and make the claims that the US went through a similar situation due to the Great Depression, issuing large denominations and can somehow be made as a comparison to what everyone is hoping for from Iraq... The big problem is that large denominations were printed long before the depression era (decades), and the fact that the depression in the US was an example of massive deflation and not hyperinflation. The monetary system in the US actually shrank rather than increase many times over like Iraq has had happen.
Posted 03 March 2012 - 04:55 PM
So if Iraq is trying to reduce the volume of currency in circulation, lets look at the numbers and tell me if it makes logical sense.
Population in Iraq: 31 million
Dinars in Circulation: 30 trillion?
30,000,000,000,000
Remove 3 zeros and you now have 30 billion in circulation.
That is on average 967 dinars per a person.
Posted 04 March 2012 - 01:35 AM
Posted 04 March 2012 - 01:46 AM
Posted 04 March 2012 - 11:46 AM
Perhaps you have wandered into the wrong room? This is "Rational Discussion", I think you may be looking for "Incoherent Ranting", that's two doors down on the left.all the bashers parking their dirty $%^# in this thread 2nite huh?
Chitown sells cheap stuff, Don't sell us THIS CHEAP STUFF CHITOWN
but i know, you're just doing your job!
The spirit of Christ compels you, TO ACT RIGHT! LEAVE DEMON!
Posted 04 March 2012 - 01:15 PM
Perhaps you have wandered into the wrong room? This is "Rational Discussion", I think you may be looking for "Incoherent Ranting", that's two doors down on the left.
Posted 04 March 2012 - 01:27 PM
My questions is when did the US take the large denoms out of circulation AND reduce their value???? If I had a $1000 US bill and I had to exchange it for the lower denoms, wouldn't I receive the lower currency to equal the amount I had to surrender? I don't recall ever hearing about large US denoms being devalued in the manner stated here.The US didn't start removing the large denominations in the 1940s, they simply stopped printing them then. They didn't start to remove them from circulation until almost 1970... And there are still a lot of high denomination notes still in circulation and are still legal tender, so completely different situations.
The US wasn't removing those notes to reduce the volume of currency in circulation as Iraq has stated their intent is to do.
On a side note since the large denominations in the US was brought up, many try and make the claims that the US went through a similar situation due to the Great Depression, issuing large denominations and can somehow be made as a comparison to what everyone is hoping for from Iraq... The big problem is that large denominations were printed long before the depression era (decades), and the fact that the depression in the US was an example of massive deflation and not hyperinflation. The monetary system in the US actually shrank rather than increase many times over like Iraq has had happen.
Posted 04 March 2012 - 01:31 PM
Edited by RVPleaseToday, 04 March 2012 - 01:32 PM.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users