George Hayduke

Members
  • Content count

    2,781
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

3,643 Excellent

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Mid Air
  • Interests
    Juxtaposition
  1. It's very possible it is not that the majority of congress wants continued war but that HR 608 is an incomplete bill as written or contains redundancy covered in 18 USC 2339A(b)(1). HR 608 as written only specifies terrorist organizations as such: (1) Al Qaeda, Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), or any individual or group that is affiliated with, associated with, cooperating with, or adherents to such groups; or (2) the government of any country that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) determines has, within the most recent 12 months, provided covered assistance to such a group or individual. Why is Rep. Gabbard excluding the already identified terrorist organization listed in Section 219 of the INA? The US Dept of State lists 60 terrorist organizations: https://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/other/des/123085.htm and defines such organizations as: Legal Criteria for Designation under Section 219 of the INA as amended It must be a foreign organization. The organization must engage in terrorist activity, as defined in section 212 (a)(3)(B) of the INA (8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B)),* or terrorism, as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 (22 U.S.C. § 2656f(d)(2)),** or retain the capability and intent to engage in terrorist activity or terrorism. The organization’s terrorist activity or terrorism must threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security (national defense, foreign relations, or the economic interests) of the United States. It is already illegal for any person in the United States to provide assistance to the Designated Terrorist list so why introduce a watered down bill such as HR 608?. Legal Ramifications of Designation It is unlawful for a person in the United States or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to knowingly provide "material support or resources" to a designated FTO. (The term "material support or resources" is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2339A(b)(1) as " any property, tangible or intangible, or service, including currency or monetary instruments or financial securities, financial services, lodging, training, expert advice or assistance, safehouses, false documentation or identification, communications equipment, facilities, weapons, lethal substances, explosives, personnel (1 or more individuals who maybe or include oneself), and transportation, except medicine or religious materials.” 18 U.S.C. § 2339A(b)(2) provides that for these purposes “the term ‘training’ means instruction or teaching designed to impart a specific skill, as opposed to general knowledge.” 18 U.S.C. § 2339A(b)(3) further provides that for these purposes the term ‘expert advice or assistance’ means advice or assistance derived from scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge.’’ Considering the Laws already on the books, HR 608 doesn't make any sense. Until I can understand it, I wouldn't support it either. GH
  2. Good Stuff! So much for Canadians not having a dog in the fight eh?
  3. Lol! Me...a bully? Nah, I'm a big soft lovable guy and a journeyman word smith. I figure if someone wants to tell lies and besmirch others character, I can at least challenge them to present supporting facts. Stay tuned there will be more to come regarding Rep. Gianforte being a 'Self Professed Felon.'
  4. You can wonder all you want but you still won't answer the question - I wonder why...Hmmmmm? Perhaps it's because you haven't read the Montana Law or don't understand it or perhaps it is because you can't back up what you spew. Come on now B/A do you even know how to have a dialogue? You made an assertion now back it up. We're on the same side Broham remember?
  5. And, I hear she rides a Ducati Scrambler
  6. I call it a weak dodge on your part - just answer the question; Bias or ignorance or both? You claim he is a 'self professed felon'. You came to that conclusion somehow - please share it. I'd really like to see your source. Do tell... what lucky break did he receive that you or I wouldn't have received? Are you talking about the 'self professed' felony charge? Well, if he professed to a 'Felony' why did the court charge him with a misdemeanor? I know how much you dislike swamp dwellers as do I, so let 'er rip potato chip, let's see your sources. For the benefit of those with reading comprehension difficulties the following is provided in BOLD font: "Sheriff Brian Gootkin... added that 'the nature of the injuries did not meet the statutory elements of felony assault.'” Here's a link for you to research the difference between Montana's Felony and Misdemeanor elements. Give it a look see before you put your foot further down your throat and prepare to apologize - it's good for character development. FELONY begins with 'F' and MISDEMEANOR begins with 'M' Further 'dodges' or refusal to engage will not be accepted. You claimed it, now own it... GH
  7. Leading with your bias or ignorance of Montana Law?
  8. http://canadafreepress.com/members/1/JudiMcLeod/2 Copyright © Canada Free PressRSS Feed for Judi McLeodJudi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years' experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com, and Glenn Beck.Older articles by Judi McLeod
  9. Thanks fellow night rider!
  10. I appreciate the compliment LGD but I think you completely missed the simple reading and intent of John 14:17. Jesus Christ is speaking: "And I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Advocate to be with you forever - the Spirit of truth -..." The Advocate or Spirit of Truth Jesus Christ is referring to 'is' the Holy Spirit. Jesus Christ then clarifies 'Who' the Spirit of Truth is by identifying Him as a person (Third Person of the Trinity) sent by God the Father and why the world does not know Him: "The world cannot receive Him, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him. But you do know Him, for He abides with you and He will be in you." John 14:7 I think Fly would agree with me that it is wise to seek guidance from men... Holy Spirit filled men of God. The very Gospel you have submitted to for your redemption was provided to you by God the Father, Jesus Christ the Son and the Holy Spirit through sixty six books of the Bible written by approximately 40 Holy Spirit inspired scribes; men. In other words, you can not know what you know about your faith, without that knowledge having first been provided to you by someone else. Here are a couple of questions for you; I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit by works of the Law, or by hearing with faith? Does God lavish His Spirit on you and work miracles among you because you practice the Law, or because you hear and believe? They're simple enough questions. The same author* answered those questions with: Consequently, faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ. Now, whether or not a person believes the earth is flat or round has no bearing on his/her salvation and shouldn't cause division between true saints; it is not a salvation issue. As for me, I agree with Job: "I have heard of You by the hearing of the ear; But now my eyes see You..." * Apostle Paul, Galatians 3:2, Galatians 3:5, Romans 10:17
  11. Thank you Fly for the simplicity. "And I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Advocate to be with you forever - the Spirit of truth. The world cannot receive Him, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him. But you do know Him, for He abides with you and He will be in you." John 14:7
  12. A Holy example of the power of fasting and prayer.